arXiv preprint ·
Inspectable LLM-Simulated Participants for Qualitative Interview Rehearsal
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
LLMs are increasingly used across research workflows, including research ideation, qualitative analysis, and participant simulation. Within work on participant simulation, prior studies have largely evaluated simulated participants by how realistic or human-like their responses appear, leaving less known about how researchers use and critique these materials when revising interview protocols before fieldwork. We present Rehearsim, an inspectable research probe that treats LLM-simulated participants as materials for methodological rehearsal rather than substitutes for human participants. Rehearsim combines literature-grounded participant construction, interactive interview rehearsal, and traceable thematic review while keeping protocol decisions under researcher control. In a study with 21 qualitative researchers, participants used simulated materials to surface assumptions and gaps, reconsider participant populations, revise target populations, and develop follow-up probes. They also identified risks, including the concealment of weak questions, dismissal of unexpected synthetic details, and interpretive anchoring from generated themes. We derive an inspectable-rehearsal framework emphasizing traceability, contestability, researcher control, and epistemic boundaries.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Human-Computer Interaction
When Better Opportunities Backfire: Service Worker Responses to Parallel AI Deployment in Customer Acquisition
Relational Complexity: Making Sense of Social Companion AI Use
When Care Expands and Control Declines: Understanding Digital Privacy in End-of-Life Care
Bias and Reliability in Learning-Style Inference from Student--AI Dialogues: An Evaluation of GPT-4o and Gemini 2.0 Flash
Cling: Supporting Cross-Page Coordination with Human-Directed, In-Situ, and Small-Step Automation
Get the few papers worth your time in Human-Computer Interaction every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.