arXiv preprint ·
When Care Expands and Control Declines: Understanding Digital Privacy in End-of-Life Care
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Terminally ill patients generate extensive digital health data through hospital portals, physiological monitoring devices, consumer health applications, and end-of-life care platforms. Yet their ability to control this data is systematically undermined by the structural conditions of terminal care. Through semi-structured in-depth interviews with 21 terminally ill patients, 11 family caregivers, and 8 physicians recruited from tertiary hospitals, this study examines the digital privacy circumstances and subjective attitudes of patients in end-of-life contexts. Thematic analysis reveals five structural dimensions of digital privacy challenge: continuous bodily digitization without meaningful informed consent; cognitive decline driving involuntary proxy control of accounts; inferential data generation exceeding patients' epistemic boundaries; dissolution of individual privacy boundaries amid relational network restructuring; and the absence of institutional governance over post-mortem data. Patient privacy attitudes span three profiles: fundamental absence of privacy awareness, sustained active management under severe tool constraints, and perception of problems followed by resigned abandonment. Interviews with caregivers and physicians reveal benevolent substitution in the name of care needs, expansion of access beyond the initial task, and unresolved boundaries under absent institutional guidance. These findings reveal a compounding privacy vulnerability unique to end-of-life contexts and call for privacy-by-design principles, granular permission mechanisms, and institutional governance frameworks tailored to the needs of dying patients.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computers & Society
Causal Humility: Governing the Authority of Fairness Claims Under Causal Uncertainty
When LLMs Manipulate: Measuring Behavioral, Social, and Temporal Effects
Evaluating LLM-Generated Feedback on Handwritten Mathematics: Feedback Quality and Subsequent Exam Performance
Conditional information Retrieval for Longitudinal Survey Harmonisation
The GenAI Who Knew Too Little: Revisiting Transactive Memory Systems in Human GenAI Collaboration
Get the few papers worth your time in Computers & Society every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.