arXiv preprint ·

Bias and Reliability in Learning-Style Inference from Student--AI Dialogues: An Evaluation of GPT-4o and Gemini 2.0 Flash

Samaneh Zamanifard, Sajad Goudarzi and Andrew Robb

Published
Source
arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
Original
Read it at arXiv
Topics
Human-Computer Interaction

Abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly integrated into educational technologies for personalized support, creating opportunities for real-time learner modeling from dialogue. This study evaluates whether GPT-4o and Gemini 2.0 Flash can infer three Felder-Silverman Learning Style Model dimensions (Active-Reflective, Sensing-Intuitive, and Sequential-Global) from short, task-focused student-AI problem-solving dialogues. Using questionnaire-derived Index of Learning Styles labels from 153 undergraduate participants, we compared deterministic zero-shot and few-shot prompting under five-fold cross-validation. Although accuracy and support-weighted F1 were moderate for Sensing-Intuitive and Sequential-Global, majority-class baselines, macro-F1, balanced accuracy, and per-class recall showed that performance was often driven by dominant-label prediction rather than reliable recognition of both classes. The models substantially under-identified Intuitive and Global learners; few-shot prompting produced mixed effects and sometimes amplified majority-class bias. Active-Reflective classification remained unstable across models. These findings indicate that LLM-generated learner-style labels should be treated as uncertain, bias-prone signals rather than stable learner profiles, and that dialogue-based personalization systems require bias-aware evaluation and uncertainty-sensitive design.

The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.

Read it on ReadSearch

Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.

Already a reader? Sign in

All new papers in Human-Computer Interaction

Get the few papers worth your time in Human-Computer Interaction every morning.

ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.

Papers belong to their authors and publishers; every page here links to the original. All research topics