arXiv preprint ·

Relational Complexity: Making Sense of Social Companion AI Use

Sophie Elizabeth Klitgaard, Grace X. Wang, Daniel M. T. Fessler and Michelle H. Tang

Published
Source
arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
Original
Read it at arXiv
Topics
Human-Computer Interaction

Abstract

The adoption of social companion AI (SCAI) is often framed in terms of the positive features it offers users, including its nonjudgemental nature, agreeableness, and availability. Here, we argue the appeal of these features primarily arises from the difficulties inherent in human sociality. SCAI reduces what we term relational complexity, or the demands and risks inherent in human relationships. Drawing insights from studies of human cognition, communication, and human-computer interaction, we identify six distinct sites of relational complexity that we posit are integral to understanding SCAI adoption. These include: (i) relationship formation and dissolution; (ii) achieving mutual understanding; (iii) interpersonal motives and strategic uncertainty; (iv) social partner evaluation and self-presentation; (v) social embeddedness and information flow; and (vi) reciprocity and relationship maintenance. By attenuating relational complexity, SCAI offers users some of the experiences associated with companionship while reducing the demands intrinsic to obtaining such experiences from another person. However, the lower interpersonal risk and diminished cognitive load that attracts users to SCAI may contribute to myriad negative impacts, including relationship displacement, social demotivation, social deskilling, and risks to privacy. The concept of relational complexity thus provides a framework for studying both the appeal of artificial companionship and its implications for human wellbeing.

The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.

Read it on ReadSearch

Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.

Already a reader? Sign in

All new papers in Human-Computer Interaction

Get the few papers worth your time in Human-Computer Interaction every morning.

ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.

Papers belong to their authors and publishers; every page here links to the original. All research topics