arXiv preprint ·
Comparing Experiences of Speech-Driven Game Modification in Solo Play, Paired Play, and Paired Watching Using the Fighting Game PATCH FIGHTER
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Players often have ideas about a game while playing it, but turning them into changes usually means stepping out of play to edit it. We built PATCH FIGHTER, a two-player fighting game defined by 91 types of adjustable parameters. A large language model (LLM) reads players' conversations during play and rewrites these parameters between games, so players can change the game just by talking. We conducted a within-subjects experiment with 27 pairs (54 participants) comparing three conditions, solo play, paired play, and paired watching. Participants rated enjoyment after each game and answered a questionnaire on speech and changes after each condition. Paired play was the most enjoyable condition. In paired play, participants also felt more able to say what they thought about the game than in solo play. In interviews, participants valued talking with the partner and checking changes through their own play. Paired watching was less preferred because they could not try the changes themselves. As our design cannot separate the enjoyment of editing from that of play, we outline a design that measures them separately and the evaluation of the resulting games as future work.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Human-Computer Interaction
When Better Opportunities Backfire: Service Worker Responses to Parallel AI Deployment in Customer Acquisition
Relational Complexity: Making Sense of Social Companion AI Use
When Care Expands and Control Declines: Understanding Digital Privacy in End-of-Life Care
Bias and Reliability in Learning-Style Inference from Student--AI Dialogues: An Evaluation of GPT-4o and Gemini 2.0 Flash
Cling: Supporting Cross-Page Coordination with Human-Directed, In-Situ, and Small-Step Automation
Get the few papers worth your time in Human-Computer Interaction every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.