arXiv preprint ·
The Male Abstraction Bias in Internet Culture and Large Language Models
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Conceptual abstraction and gender are two equally central aspects of the human mind, yet they have traditionally been studied in isolation from one another, as though they were fundamentally separate. Here, we find gender and abstraction are systematically linked throughout the space of concepts spanning single (N = 40,000) and multi-word expressions (N = 67,000): across billions of words and millions of images on the internet --- and across numerous measurement techniques, including human and AI classifications --- more abstract concepts are more associated with men, a pattern we show replicates in languages around the world. This male abstraction bias not only holds across semantic domains, but it also maps onto grammatical structure: verbs and adverbs are more abstract and more male-coded, revealing a system-wide trace of stereotypes accentuating agentic qualities in men. Furthermore, we show this bias readily emerges in the free associations humans and AIs produce in controlled online tasks, indicating its psychological internalization and its algorithmic reproduction. These findings identify a latent structure in conceptual space that unifies a range of stereotypes: for example, framings of women as more embodied, emotional, and warm, versus men as more cognitive, rational, and competent; as well as erroneous views of men as better at mathematics, science, and engineering. More broadly, by analyzing an unprecedentedly large, multimodal sample of online data, we provide culture-wide evidence of gender as a core organizing principle shaping conceptual space far beyond the characterization of people and social roles.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computers & Society
Swapping the Judge Changes the Ranking: A Preregistered Study of Cross-Provider Replication in LLM-Judged System Comparisons
Sure Enough to Share? Overconfidence in GenAI Video Discernment is Associated with Sharing Intentions
Palimpsestic Accountability in the US Federal AI Inventories
Thick Alignment: A Social Framework for Values and AI Systems
From Guidelines to Practice: Defining Requirements for AI Red-Teaming Tools
Get the few papers worth your time in Computers & Society every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.