arXiv preprint ·
Thick Alignment: A Social Framework for Values and AI Systems
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Computer science research on the "alignment" of artificial intelligence (AI) systems treats human values as content to be specified and optimized. Decades of social science scholarship describe values differently, as enacted in ordinary practice, interpreted in social context, and contested across plural orders of evaluation and worth. We argue that the dominant alignment techniques, which we call "thin alignment," convert situated moral or value judgments into one or a few metrics via devices of commensuration such as preference labeling, reward modeling, and consumer ratings. Drawing on philosophical and anthropological accounts of thickness, "thick alignment" instead examines how values take shape, inform the development of AI systems, and become subject to contestation over whose interests they serve. We describe two forms of misalignment in seemingly aligned algorithmic systems that highlight thin alignment: "Halcyon misalignment," which presumes a prior, just equilibrium of technology and values from which a system has departed, and "Mirrored misalignment," which names the risks and harms produced by systems that are aligned in a thin sense yet accurately reproduce an unequal social order. A thick account registers such systems as misaligned. We then trace how researchers have taken up and adapted the concept of thick alignment since it was first proposed in 2023, using these adaptations to refine the concept, and to distill three of its pillars: (1) contextual description that both reflects and constitutes values; (2) interrogation of values across the life cycle of a system; and (3) shared, accountable decision-making through which affected publics help determine which values guide the system. We close by considering implications for AI research and policy.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computers & Society
Sure Enough to Share? Overconfidence in GenAI Video Discernment is Associated with Sharing Intentions
Code, Commits, and Complexity in the GenAI Era: A Longitudinal Study of Team-Based Capstone Projects
Digital Security Under Compound Threats: Surveillance, Threat Reasoning, and Habituation Among North Korean Defectors in China
InterSim: Innovative Intersection Digital Twins for Human-in-the-Loop Driving Simulation
The Popular Get More Popular: Auditing Brand Bias in Generative Search
Get the few papers worth your time in Computers & Society every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.