arXiv preprint ·
Neural networks and games
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Hopfield neural networks and noncooperative games provide seemingly different approaches to understanding how collective outcomes emerge from local interactions. In a neural network, individual units adjust their states according to local signals; in a game, players choose actions to maximise individual payoffs. I establish an exact equivalence between symmetric binary Hopfield networks and binary-action games that admit a quadratic potential. The equivalence identifies stable network configurations with pure-strategy Nash equilibria, and asynchronous neural updating with best-response dynamics. More broadly, the storage and retrieval of memories in neural networks correspond, respectively, to the design and selection of equilibria in games.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Neural & Evolutionary Computing
Efficient Equilibrium Computation in Colonel Blotto Games
Polynomial-Time Computation of Extensive-Form Proper Equilibria in Two-Player Zero-Sum Games
Classification Aggregation with Multiple Memberships
Learning AI Agents, Market Makers, and Stress in Automated Markets
Persistence of Bounded Rationality in Financial Markets: An Evolutionary Game-Theoretic Model
Get the few papers worth your time in Neural & Evolutionary Computing every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.