arXiv preprint ·
Learning AI Agents, Market Makers, and Stress in Automated Markets
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Automated markets increasingly route order flow from learning trading agents through automated market makers (AMMs). We model trader archetypes as AI agents defined by their reward functions and analyze the feedback they create on a constant-product AMM. Herd-dominated and arbitrage-dominated markets of equal size have identical return distributions and turnover, so no rule based on volatility, value-at-risk, stress frequency, or volume can tell them apart; yet their stress episodes differ in length by a factor unbounded in the feedback-to-noise ratio $β/s$. Serial statistics identify the feedback sign from $Θ((s/β)^2\log(1/δ))$ observations, and this rate is tight. When agents trade together, profit-seeking agents ride herds rather than lean against them, leading to all-or-nothing participation. Spread-earning market makers restore stability but make liquidity fragile, with discontinuous collapse and hysteresis; maker--taker pricing, not a uniform fee, is the effective instrument.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Econometrics
Classification Aggregation with Multiple Memberships
Persistence of Bounded Rationality in Financial Markets: An Evolutionary Game-Theoretic Model
Efficient Equilibrium Computation in Colonel Blotto Games
Algorithmic Monoculture in Machine Learning-based Site-Specific Fertilizer Recommendation
Neural networks and games
Get the few papers worth your time in Econometrics every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.