arXiv preprint ·

When AI Agents Act on Our Behalf: A Taxonomy of Human-Agent Interaction Failure

Canwen Wang, Qing Xiao, Haiyi Zhu and Hong Shen

Published
Source
arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
Original
Read it at arXiv
Topics
Human-Computer InteractionArtificial IntelligenceComputers & Society

Abstract

AI agents write and execute code, manipulate user interfaces, and transact on their users' behalf. We ask what forms failure takes in human-agent interaction, and how those forms change as agents act with greater autonomy. From 695 documented incidents in two public repositories, we developed 12 failure modes bottom-up within three interaction stages adapted from Amershi et al.'s guidelines, coding the autonomy at which each arose. What a person can do when an agent fails depends on how much the agent completes between points of user involvement--a property fixed at deployment. Therefore, the same model on the same task can fail differently under different configurations. All 12 modes appear at both low and high autonomy, and rising autonomy changes the form each failure takes. Users need controls between full delegation and full manual work, and neither incident records nor agent benchmarks reach the interaction where these failures occur.

The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.

Read it on ReadSearch

Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.

Already a reader? Sign in

All new papers in Human-Computer Interaction

Get the few papers worth your time in Human-Computer Interaction every morning.

ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.

Papers belong to their authors and publishers; every page here links to the original. All research topics