arXiv preprint ·
Dual-Axis Policy Entailment: A Benchmark for Policy-Change Reasoning
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Whether a policy shifts domains and, by extension, continues, broadens, narrows, or reverses previous policy is of paramount importance to the study of public policy. We propose Dual-Axis Policy Entailment (DAPE), which evaluates an ordered pair of policy directives on both dimensions at once: a binary judgment determines whether the two directives govern the same policy domain, and a five-way judgment determines whether the later directive continues, broadens, narrows, or reverses the earlier policy, or governs a different domain altogether. Read together, the two judgments form one five-category label, our primary metric. The two-axis design captures two central dimensions of policy change without conflating errors on either dimension into a generic "irrelevant" label, and it makes annotation more rigorous: a coder cannot dismiss a difficult pair as domain-irrelevant without an explicit, checkable decision. We introduce an expert-annotated benchmark of 1,000 ordered directive pairs drawn from a large corpus of Chinese government policy, together with an annotation-calibration protocol (an adjudication packet with pre/post agreement measurement) that we contribute as a methodological artifact. Fourteen open-weight models and four frontier API flagships fail the task zero-shot: even the best frontier flagship's chance-corrected agreement with expert labels is far below the human ceiling (Cohen's $κ\approx 0.29$ vs. $0.53$). A fine-tuned open-weight model (LoRA SFT of Qwen3-14B, five-fold cross-validation) closes this gap, reaching the coder-mutual human ceiling ($κ= 0.524$ vs. $0.527$). Finally, we apply our method to China's AI policy (1980-2024) and map the direction of policy change across eras.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computation & Language / NLP
Do Social Influence Pressures Move LLM Agents? Evidence from Delegated Audit Judgment
BanglishDepYT: Depression Detection in Native Bengali Social Media with Emotion-Preserving Preprocessing and Domain-Adaptive Pretraining
Rubric-Based Assessment of Student Reports Using Small Language Models
ROD-Dataset: A Pedestrian-Perspective Benchmark of Urban Obstacle Classes for YOLO-Based Detection
To Align Long, Plan Short: Simulating Diverse Profile-Aligned Students by Realizing Short-Term Plans in Long-Horizon Learning Environments
Get the few papers worth your time in Computation & Language / NLP every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.