arXiv preprint ·

How to Simplify a Line Chart: A Taxonomy and Feature-Based Evaluation

Rifat Ara Proma and Paul Rosen

Published
Source
arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
Original
Read it at arXiv
Topics
Human-Computer InteractionComputer VisionGraphics

Abstract

Simplifying large or noisy time-series is often a prerequisite for producing interpretable line charts, yet existing methods vary widely in how they alter visual features such as trends, extrema, periodicity, curvature, roughness, and overall complexity. We introduce a feature-based taxonomy of line chart simplification that evaluates 19 commonly used algorithms across three families: Transformers, Reducers, and Aggregators. We also formalize 12 perceptually motivated, computationally defined visual features commonly used when analyzing time-series in line charts. We assess preservation using multiple similarity metrics per feature to capture different aspects of fidelity, yielding 21 distinct feature-preservation measurements. To capture the trade-off between fidelity and simplicity, we introduce a Feature--Complexity (FC) score that combines feature preservation with complexity. Our systematic evaluation on 80 datasets reveals distinct family-level patterns: Transformers such as Gaussian, Mean, and Median filters achieve A-mode grades on nearly all metrics but retain full temporal resolution; Reducers such as Douglas-Peucker and M4 receive predominantly D-F mode grades trading fidelity for a reduction in the number of rendered points; and Aggregators ASAP and PAA occupy a middle ground with primarily B-C mode grades. We further characterize the predictability of algorithm behavior across datasets: some methods produce consistent grades regardless of dataset type (Gaussian, Mean, Douglas-Peucker), while others exhibit high data-dependency, with performance varying substantially based on dataset characteristics (FPCS, ASAP). An interactive website supporting exploration of all evaluated techniques, datasets, and results is available at https://feature-taxonomy.vercel.app/.

The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.

Read it on ReadSearch

Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.

Already a reader? Sign in

All new papers in Human-Computer Interaction

Get the few papers worth your time in Human-Computer Interaction every morning.

ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.

Papers belong to their authors and publishers; every page here links to the original. All research topics