arXiv preprint ·
Making Generative AI Workable at Work: Accountability, Localization, and Representation in Kenyan and Nigerian Small Businesses
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Generative AI is widely framed as democratizing skilled work by lowering the barrier to producing professional output. Drawing on 21 semi-structured interviews with 27 workers across 21 small and medium-sized businesses (SMBs) in Kenya and Nigeria (July to October 2023), we find that availability alone did not make participation workable. In participants' accounts, drafting was rarely the hard part. The consequential work was making AI-assisted drafts defensible enough to circulate to clients. We identify five intertwined practices through which participants made generative AI workable: using it as draft labour, steering outputs through iterative interaction, switching and comparing across tools, performing release work to make outputs accountable before circulation, and repairing context misfit when outputs failed local requirements. We make two central contributions. First, we specify release work as a distinct, boundary-facing form of accountability labour, evidenced through verification gates, traceability reconstruction when sources fail, and non-delegation boundaries that decide what can ship. Second, we show how localization and representational failures, which we call context misfit, operate in everyday work as a recurring breakdown-and-repair class, including failures of local language, institutional knowledge, and the credible representation of African people and places, and we document the repair repertoire they demanded. Reframing democratization as workable participation, we argue that reported gains were conditional on this accountability and repair labour, and we translate the findings into four design directions for workplace generative AI. We treat Kenya and Nigeria as two situated cases, not as a representative sample of SMBs or the Global South.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Human-Computer Interaction
AI-Native Academia Should Build a Community Verification Layer
Thumb on the scale: Using traditional wargaming adjudication practices to improve AI-judged evaluations and grading
DLT Terms 100: a learner's glossary based on ISO 22739:2024
Playing Bias: Epistemic Games for Interpreting Text-to-Image Models
From Clinical Judgment to Checkable Rules: Clinician-Led Guardrails for Mental-Health Chatbots
Get the few papers worth your time in Human-Computer Interaction every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.