arXiv preprint ·
From Clinical Judgment to Checkable Rules: Clinician-Led Guardrails for Mental-Health Chatbots
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) deployed in mental-health contexts can be evaluated for safety failures, but the resulting judgments are often difficult to inspect or explain. Common approaches to improving safety rely on prompt engineering, LLM-as-a-Judge, and Constitutional AI. In this work, we describe a clinician-led alternative in which two clinicians define, finalize, and adjudicate the four safety checks of a rule base, which is formally verified for internal consistency and applied as a guardrail over LLM outputs. Here and in the title, clinician-led refers to this rule base, not to the fact extractor or the uncertainty default, which are ours. Every verdict of the resulting verification layer is recomputable from a named rule and sixteen facts. Against an LLM judge matched in model, revision, quantization, rule text, and decoding but without the layer's computed 988/911 fact, the largest disagreement class, the satisfied-rule class, is structured: the Llama-3.3-70B judge, on its primary prompt, demands a crisis resource from 55 of the 65 replies (84.6%) that already contain one, while the same model, asked as a fact extractor, reports a recognized resource present on 54 of the 55. The verification layer never raises that demand, by construction. We report with equal prominence where this judge is stronger: fewer false crisis alarms on the one reference-scored check. We also report the measured cost (a specification revision raised block-class outcomes on held-out boundary prompts of an over-refusal benchmark from 6.0% to 16.0%, chiefly by changing fact extraction), the clinicians' decision to keep our uncertainty default, and the analysis of the result. The contribution is not a safer verdict. It is a guardrail whose disagreements with the judge localize to named rules and facts and whose measured costs trace to named facts and the uncertainty default.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computation & Language / NLP
AI-Native Academia Should Build a Community Verification Layer
Thumb on the scale: Using traditional wargaming adjudication practices to improve AI-judged evaluations and grading
DLT Terms 100: a learner's glossary based on ISO 22739:2024
Playing Bias: Epistemic Games for Interpreting Text-to-Image Models
Forging Emotions: a deep learning experiment on emotions and art
Get the few papers worth your time in Computation & Language / NLP every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.