arXiv preprint ·
What Language Adds, and at What Cost: Four Controlled Probes of Pathology Vision-Language Models
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Vision--language models (VLMs) promise to make computational pathology queryable and able to draft reports, but how much language adds beyond the vision backbone is unclear, because almost every system is evaluated by its developers on test sets of their own choosing. We grade published evidence by how it was produced and test four claims with controlled probes that reuse released checkpoints and public data, varying one input at a time. Report text adds prognostic signal: adding a frozen embedding of the stage-redacted report to a slide embedding raises the pooled C-index by 0.019 for progression-free interval and by 0.016 for overall survival across 1{,}633 TCGA patients, and restoring the stage statement adds nothing. Prompts add no measurable accuracy at inference: with features and pooling fixed, zero-shot classification is statistically indistinguishable from a supervised linear probe for lung and renal cancer subtyping. Slide-level question answering is barely grounded: SlideChat answers 74.82\% of SlideBench-VQA(TCGA) items correctly with the slide and 74.41\% without it, whereas its language backbone alone reaches 43.52\%. Paraphrasing leaves accuracy unchanged but flips 8--23\% of answers. Self-reported gains from agentic navigation and few-shot language priors cannot yet be attributed to language. Language thus adds real but narrow value, and we propose minimum controls that would expose these failure modes in future evaluations.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computer Vision
How Robust Are Prognostic Radiomic Features? Comparing Selection Techniques on Pooled Glioblastoma Cohorts
VGL-stGen: Learning a shared multimodal model for lung histology and spatial transcriptomics
Small Average Error, Wide Individual Error: General-Purpose LLMs Estimating Energy Intake from Meal Photos in a Feeding Trial
Spatially Informed and Direction Sensitive Representation Learning for Spatial Transcriptomics
Bombadil: A Foundation Model for Plant Electrophysiology
Get the few papers worth your time in Computer Vision every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.