arXiv preprint ·
Small Average Error, Wide Individual Error: General-Purpose LLMs Estimating Energy Intake from Meal Photos in a Feeding Trial
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Photo-based estimation of food energy could ease dietary assessment, and general-purpose multimodal large language models (LLMs) make such estimates easy to obtain. Most evaluations use one photo taken before eating and compare with energy served, while dietary assessment needs energy eaten. We evaluated eight models from three vendors (Claude Haiku, Sonnet and Opus 5.5; GPT-6 luna, 6.1 sol and 6 astra; Gemini 3.8 Flash and 4 Argon) on 802 meals from ACETADA, a controlled feeding trial with weighed intake, with the before photo only, before and after photos in separate calls (subtraction), or both photos in one request. Three results ran against intuition. Subtraction under-estimated intake for six of eight models, because the models still report hundreds of kilocalories for a nearly empty tray. Scaling the before-only estimate by the average share eaten (0.87) matched much of the gain from the after photo; beyond that constant, the second photo lowered meal-level error by only 2.2 to 4.4 points, mainly in meals with food left. With one photo, two models had a near-zero intake bias only because they under-estimated the served energy and ignored uneaten food. In ablations, adding the after photo improved accuracy under both prompt formats for seven models, while prompt effects varied across models. Over 148 feeding days, five models kept the 90% confidence interval of their mean error within a pre-set 10% margin; one model also met the pre-set 30% limits of agreement, narrowly (-28% to +27%; limits outside 30% cannot be excluded), and the other seven did not. Protein was under-estimated by every model, most in protein-dense meals; repeated calls changed error by at most 1.4 points; a high reasoning effort helped only the smallest model. A low average bias is not evidence of accurate individual intake estimation; such estimates should support, not replace, assessment by a dietitian.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Human-Computer Interaction
How Robust Are Prognostic Radiomic Features? Comparing Selection Techniques on Pooled Glioblastoma Cohorts
VGL-stGen: Learning a shared multimodal model for lung histology and spatial transcriptomics
Spatially Informed and Direction Sensitive Representation Learning for Spatial Transcriptomics
Bombadil: A Foundation Model for Plant Electrophysiology
Kinetic Proofreading Activation Times Beyond the Weibull Limit
Get the few papers worth your time in Human-Computer Interaction every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.