arXiv preprint ·

How Robust Are Prognostic Radiomic Features? Comparing Selection Techniques on Pooled Glioblastoma Cohorts

Yannick Sodonougbo, Marlene Schnieders, Alexia Rizoudis, Santiago Cepeda, Frank Kramer and Dominik Müller

Published
Source
arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
Original
Read it at arXiv
Topics
Computer VisionArtificial IntelligenceQuantitative Methods

Abstract

Radiomic survival studies in glioblastoma report heterogeneous prognostic features, but how much of this stems from the methodology itself is rarely examined. We analysed the association of 463 radiomic, anatomical and clinical features from pre-treatment MRI with overall survival in 705 IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients from three public cohorts, using three techniques: a log-rank test after median split, univariate Cox regression (both Benjamini-Hochberg corrected) and an XGBoost regressor interpreted with SHAP. The log-rank test selected 99 features, Cox regression 72 and SHAP its top 20; five were selected by all three: age, a peritumoural T2 texture feature, the number of connected peritumoural mask components and two image-level intensity maxima. The two survival tests shared 51 features, about half of the SHAP top 20 were also selected by either test, and where selections overlapped, effect directions agreed. Many selections were PyRadiomics diagnostic descriptors that are not restricted to tumour voxels. Analytical pipeline choices, including ranking method, pre-filtering and descriptor handling, can substantially influence which features appear prognostic.

The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.

Read it on ReadSearch

Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.

Already a reader? Sign in

All new papers in Computer Vision

Get the few papers worth your time in Computer Vision every morning.

ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.

Papers belong to their authors and publishers; every page here links to the original. All research topics