arXiv preprint ·
Provable Authority: A Protocol for Verifiable Authority Resolution and Control Across Human, Organizational, and Agentic Transactions
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Payment systems authenticate users, devices, accounts, and cryptographic credentials, but a relying party, such as a counterparty, payment rail, marketplace, or autonomous agent runtime, generally cannot obtain compact, independently verifiable evidence that the party presenting one exact transaction holds current organizational authority to execute it under the applicable evidence, policy, budget, and approval state. Agentic commerce makes this gap operationally urgent: a software agent can produce a valid signature while acting outside its delegated purpose, after its sponsor's authority has changed, or on transaction details that differ from those a human approved. We describe the ChainIT Authority Protocol, a subject-neutral and rail-neutral pre-execution authority and evidence control plane. The protocol separates durable identity, a versioned organizational authority record (the Authority Resolution Pactvera), sourced evidence assertions, deterministic reason-coded policy predicates, and organization-configured dispositions; binds each decision and human approval to a canonical transaction digest; reserves capacity atomically so that limits hold under concurrency; and authorizes commit only through a single-use, sender-constrained Execution Authorization Credential consumed at the rail adapter, with append-only lifecycle evidence sealed after the terminal outcome. An Agent Subject Profile adds the workload registration, attested key hierarchy, and sovereignty boundary required when the acting subject is an AI agent, without introducing a separate authority concept. We specify the commit-time execution predicate and bounded-freshness status rules, give enforcement profiles for fiat (ACH, wire, card, instant payment) and stablecoin rails, and state residual risks and non-goals.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Cryptography & Security
Cooperation Without Adaptation: LLM Agents in a Collective-Risk Dilemma
IF-MAP: Influence-Function-Inspired Agent Prioritization in Multi-Agent Systems
Adding Heavy-Ball Momentum to Distributed Constrained Optimization for Energy Resource Management Subject to Time-Delays and Quantization
KiranaBench: Can a Language Model Run a Neighbourhood Shop?
Low-Bit Distributed Constrained Optimization with Application to Optimal Scheduling and Allocation
Get the few papers worth your time in Cryptography & Security every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.