arXiv preprint ·
IF-MAP: Influence-Function-Inspired Agent Prioritization in Multi-Agent Systems
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Published in
- arXiv
- DOI
- 10.48550/arxiv.2610.24383
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Cited by
- 0 works, as OpenAlex counts them
- Topics
Abstract
Improving every agent in an LLM-based multi-agent system can be prohibitively costly, making it important to identify which agent should be prioritized to achieve the greatest system-level gain with limited resources. Failure attribution can inform this decision, but an agent's responsibility for failures does not directly reveal the system-level gains achievable by improving it. We therefore introduce IF-MAP, an influence-function-inspired method for identifying agents with high potential for system-level improvement. For each agent, IF-MAP measures end-to-end loss changes under controlled semantic prompt perturbations, fits a regularized local response model in a low-dimensional prompt-embedding subspace, and uses the estimated response norm as a priority score. This black-box procedure requires no access to model parameters or gradients and produces agent priorities that can guide subsequent improvement effort. We evaluate IF-MAP across six multi-agent workflows spanning code generation, question answering, and mathematical reasoning, using the same priorities for prompt optimization and model upgrades. Optimizing the selected agents' prompts achieves a macro-average gain of 3.81 percentage points, compared with 1.85 for uniform agent selection. Across five target models, upgrading the selected agents yields macro-average gains of 7.62-16.42 percentage points, compared with 3.81-8.62 for uniform agent selection. Despite its probing overhead, IF-MAP reduces Qwen3-8B and DeepSeek-V3.2 token use by 74.2% and 35.2%, respectively, relative to optimizing every agent, and reduces target-model tokens by 63.6-64.9% relative to upgrading every agent. These results support the use of IF-MAP to identify promising agents and direct improvement effort toward greater end-to-end performance gains.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Artificial Intelligence
Scam Town: Can Scam Education Spread Like a Vaccine?
Adding Heavy-Ball Momentum to Distributed Constrained Optimization for Energy Resource Management Subject to Time-Delays and Quantization
Explore or Confirm? LLM Agents Misallocate Measurements Under Noise
Low-Bit Distributed Constrained Optimization with Application to Optimal Scheduling and Allocation
How Far Can an Agent Push? Trust-Safety Margins in Live Language-Based Economic Games
Get the few papers worth your time in Artificial Intelligence every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.