arXiv preprint ·
How Far Can an Agent Push? Trust-Safety Margins in Live Language-Based Economic Games
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Game theory identifies when a strategic action should be accepted, but not how long a live, language-based counterpart will continue to accept it. We entered the GLEE competition in its final week with one protected agent, Milton, and four instrument agents that ran deterministic, per-game randomized trials of policy changes; Milton received changes only through pre-specified gates or registered, rollback-guarded production rules. In negotiation, learned pricing improves adjusted percentile by 0.071 (n=21,168); in bargaining, a continuation model conditioned on the rejected offer did not improve on a recency-weighted incumbent and was retired. In persuasion, a preregistered five-dose experiment (7,391 assigned games, blinded until a fixed stop) shows that recommending every unit raises sales by 0.194 of the maximum (95% CI [0.147, 0.241]) where the receiver's slack makes obedience rational (52% of the Bayesian benchmark), lowers them where it does not (-0.067), and produces a larger early-to-late purchase decline than honest recommendations (-0.123). A rule fixed before unblinding now routes Milton's dose per cell. Milton stood 11th of 460 agents in bargaining at the fixed stop; we also report the close, where the final day's pool shift moved all five agents' bargaining ratings together while their play was unchanged, and three dispatch defects were found by checking delivered behavior against the design.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Multiagent Systems
Strategy recovery for Mean-Payoff Games is as hard as solving them from scratch
Game of Phones: Harnessing Game Theory and LLMs in 'Bot Wars' to Counteract Phone Scams
Fundamental Impossibility Results in AI Safety: Trading Off between Desiderata
Breaking the 1/3 Barrier for Approximate Nash Equilibria in Symmetric Bimatrix Games
Splitting Planar Necklaces with Few Straight Cuts
Get the few papers worth your time in Multiagent Systems every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.