arXiv preprint ·
Cooperation Without Adaptation: LLM Agents in a Collective-Risk Dilemma
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Language-model agents are increasingly deployed to act on behalf of people in settings where individual decisions shape shared outcomes. We examine whether five production models adapt their contributions to changing risks and partner behaviour, or instead follow a relatively fixed strategy. In a collective-risk dilemma game (CRG), six players contribute to a shared pool over ten rounds; if the pool falls short of its target, a catastrophe may destroy their remaining resources. Four models contributed approximately an equal share at every positive risk level, and four of the five also contributed when risk was zero, even though contributing could not improve their payoff. Explicitly stating that only the agent's own payoff mattered reduced zero-risk contributions for most models, while a more neutral prompt did not. Several models correctly identified which action offered the higher expected payoff at different risk levels, yet their contributions changed little. Against fixed partners, no model consistently chose the payoff-maximising response, and in mixed-model groups, a single agent's shortfall in the final round could cause an otherwise successful group to fail. Payoff-based selection also depended on population composition: in a single six-agent group, it favoured the model that contributed least and reduced group success, whereas in larger, randomly mixed populations, it favoured an exact fair-share model at moderate and high risk. These findings show that cooperative self-play alone is not evidence of strategic adaptability. Consistent with a machine-behaviour approach, evaluations of agents in multi-agent systems should test how they respond to incentives, partner actions, and population composition.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computer Science & Game Theory
Anytime Contracts for AI Services
Tree Plurality Veto: Voting in Few Rounds with Efficient Communication and Low Metric Distortion
Cooperation Without Shared Rewards via Reciprocal Q-Augmentation
Proportionality in Ranking Compression
Strategy recovery for Mean-Payoff Games is as hard as solving them from scratch
Get the few papers worth your time in Computer Science & Game Theory every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.