arXiv preprint ·
From Written Response to Dialogue with AI: How Activity Format, Interaction Modality, and Language Impact Student Learning and Engagement
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
The widespread availability of LLMs is challenging written learning activities, as students can increasingly generate responses without necessarily engaging with the learning content. Conversational AI creates an opportunity to redesign these activities as dialogue, while multilingual capabilities may make such dialogue more accessible to students learning through a non-native language. We conducted a field study with 305 native Kannada-speaking undergraduate students at English-medium institutions in Karnataka, India. We compared written response activities with text- and voice-based dialogic activities with AI, each conducted in English-only or bilingual Kannada-English settings. Students who completed dialogic activities spent more time on the activities, contributed more, and reported greater interest and self-efficacy than those completing written responses, although fewer students completed the dialogic activities overall. Knowledge increased across all conditions, with no reliable differences in gains between activity formats or languages. Language shaped participation differently across modalities: bilingual interaction was particularly beneficial in voice dialogue, where it reduced articulation difficulties, increased turns demonstrating understanding, and reduced conversation abandonment. However, students also valued English because of its connection to their academic and professional aspirations. These findings show that designing dialogic learning with AI requires more than choosing between writing and dialogue, voice and text, or English and students' native languages. We highlight opportunities to give learners greater control over modality, information, and pace, and to use native languages as translanguaging support rather than as a replacement for English.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Human-Computer Interaction
Visual Grounding Safety in Vision-Language Models
Evaluating human-AI workflows for field research in viticulture
Planetary Geospatial Foundation Models: A New Paradigm for Global Public Health
From Algorithmic Marginalization to AI-Mediated Re-Centering: Can Culturally Grounded AI Bring Hakka Language and Culture Back into Mainstream Society?
Curriculum Brain: Constructing Curriculum Knowledge Graphs as a Substrate for Cognitive Diagnosis
Get the few papers worth your time in Human-Computer Interaction every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.