arXiv preprint ·
Curriculum Brain: Constructing Curriculum Knowledge Graphs as a Substrate for Cognitive Diagnosis
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Cognitive Diagnostic Models (CDMs) identify which specific skills a student has and has not mastered, the signal a personalized learning path needs and a single aggregate score cannot give. Yet they are rarely deployed. The obstacle is their precondition: the Q-matrix, a mapping from every assessment item to the skills it requires, historically authored by hand. We separate the task into two stages: first construct the curriculum's own knowledge graph, the full space of concepts and skills it contains, independent of any item; then map items against that graph on demand. This paper addresses the first stage only. The item-mapping stage is designed but not implemented here, so the claim that this shifts judgment cost from once per item to once per curriculum is a design rationale rather than a finding. We present Curriculum Brain, a two-repository system pairing a version-controlled knowledge base with an agentic pipeline of eleven single-responsibility agents under a thin deterministic orchestrator. It generates candidate concept-skill mappings from official curriculum documents, checks them against accumulated rules, and compares them with a concept-skill map extracted independently from the textbook, repairing its own failures and escalating to a human only when it cannot resolve a case itself. Across 241 chapter runs (168 distinct chapters), 41.5% produced a Generator output passing both checks without a patch, and 67.6% resolved without escalation. Both are measured against criteria the system itself produced, so both describe internal consistency rather than agreement with an external standard, and both pool two pipeline configurations separated by a single change at run 77; after it the figures are 57.0% and 91.5%. Observed spend was $1.19 per chapter, API spend only, excluding human review. We release both the framework and the resulting curriculum dataset.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computers & Society
Visual Grounding Safety in Vision-Language Models
Evaluating human-AI workflows for field research in viticulture
Planetary Geospatial Foundation Models: A New Paradigm for Global Public Health
From Algorithmic Marginalization to AI-Mediated Re-Centering: Can Culturally Grounded AI Bring Hakka Language and Culture Back into Mainstream Society?
Detecting LLM-Assisted Vietnamese Writing via Keystrokes under Behavioral Manipulation
Get the few papers worth your time in Computers & Society every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.