arXiv preprint ·

A Global Comparison of Schemas, Transparency, and Interoperability in Public-Sector AI Registers and Inventories

Dipto Das and Shion Guha

Published
Source
arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
Published in
arXiv
DOI
10.1145/3847238.3849037
Original
Read it at arXiv
Cited by
0 works, as OpenAlex counts them
Topics
Artificial IntelligenceComputers & SocietyHuman-Computer Interaction

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) registers and inventories aim to make governmental AI visible, but their institutional scope, schemas, and reporting practices construct different representations of public-sector AI. We compare 8,368 records from country-specific and transnational inventories covering 72 countries. Across 23 harmonized fields, registers shared a descriptive core but rarely requested information about appeals, risks, legal bases, or external evaluation. We found that broad schemas often contained substantial missingness, schema similarity showed no significant patterned convergence, and multiple sources covering the same jurisdictions overlapped only selectively. Based on these findings, we synthesize a layered visibility framework that shows how register records reflect disclosure arrangements and why interoperability requires shared concepts, clear definitions, and preserved provenance.

The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.

Read it on ReadSearch

Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.

Already a reader? Sign in

All new papers in Artificial Intelligence

Get the few papers worth your time in Artificial Intelligence every morning.

ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.

Papers belong to their authors and publishers; every page here links to the original. All research topics