arXiv preprint ·
Beyond Provenance: The Economics and Governance of Personalized AI Memory
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Personalized AI memories, defined as persistent decision-relevant states distilled by platforms from long-run human-AI interaction, are increasingly portable, provenance-certifiable, and tradable. Provenance answers the question of origin, but it does not settle who holds which rights over a memory, nor how wider deployment affects its future supply. We develop a unified model in which memory use is non-rival, while refresh, the maintenance of continued validity, is relationally co-produced by the represented individual and the platform. Even assuming perfect provenance and complete information, the model still yields a set of inherent limitations. First, there is an extraction ceiling: decision value is bounded by lived experience. Second, a rights-separation theorem shows that no budget-balanced ownership assignment can make both co-producers residual claimants, and that control rights and cash-flow rights operate on distinct margins. Third, a depletion result indicates that reach-expanding policies such as portability, interoperability, and competition raise current access but shrink the long-run memory stock. Fourth, we offer a formal comparison between memory ownership as it ought to be (subject-held) and as it is (platform-held); the welfare ranking reduces to two measurable quantities, both dominated by interior renewable-claim bundles. Finally, endogenous-quality and market-formation results show that uncompensated markets pollute their own raw material, that transparency and compensation are complements, and that the de facto platform-ownership regime is self-perpetuating. On the design side, the analysis points to separated provenance, performance, and permission credentials; compensation indexed to quality-deployment; and portability and salience, rather than nominal ownership, as the binding policy margins.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computer Science & Game Theory
Understanding Human Perception of Representation in Citizens' Assemblies: An Empirical Study
Behavior is Not Enough: A Mechanism-Based Evaluation of Social Norm Emergence in LLM Societies
Agent-based Modeling: Equilibrium, Echo Chambers, and Efficiency in Hybrid Coevolutionary Opinion Games
Building Socio-Affective Artificial Intelligence for Interactive Multi-Agent Simulations
Learning the Cost of Reliable Inference
Get the few papers worth your time in Computer Science & Game Theory every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.