PubMed ·

Diagnostic Agreement and Threshold Correspondence Between Resting Full-Cycle Ratio and Nicorandil-Based Fractional Flow Reserve in Intermediate Coronary Stenosis: A Prospective Single-Center Registry.

Yonghoon Shin, Onyou Kim, Gi Won Yu, Yun Won Lee, Jung-Joon Cha, Hyung Joon Joo, Jae Hyoung Park, Soon Jun Hong and Cheol Woong Yu

Published
Source
PubMed
Original
Read it at PubMed
Topics
Cardiology

In brief

Decoding Coronary Stenosis Measurements

This study sheds light on the agreement between RFR and nicorandil-based FFR in a cohort of 300 patients, revealing that while overall agreement is high, discrepancies are more pronounced near the FFR decision boundary.

What they found: The study found that RFR and nicorandil-based FFR demonstrated an overall agreement of 85.0%, with an impressive AUC of 0.932. However, discrepancies were notably higher near the FFR 0.80 threshold, with agreement dropping to 72.0%. This suggests that while RFR is a reliable measure, caution is needed in the critical zones where misalignment occurs.

AI-written summary, not medical advice. Check anything you rely on against the original paper.

From the abstract

RFR has shown good aggregate agreement with FFR, including in prior Asian cohorts using intracoronary nicorandil. Where RFR-FFR disagreement is concentrated relative to the FFR 0.80 decision boundary, and how the two binary thresholds correspond, remain incompletely characterized.

The opening of the authors’ abstract. The rest is with PubMed.

Read the full abstract at PubMed

Read it on ReadSearch

Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.

Already a reader? Sign in

All new papers in Cardiology

Get the few papers worth your time in Cardiology every morning.

ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.

Papers belong to their authors and publishers; every page here links to the original. All research topics