OpenAlex ·

Generative and deterministic deep learning models comparison for fine-scale precipitation retrievals from infrared brightness temperature

Matthieu Meignin, Cécile Mallet and Nicolas Viltard

Published
Source
OpenAlex
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2610.09859
Original
Read it at the publisher
Topics
Earth & Environmental Science

Abstract

Accurate precipitation estimation at fine spatial scales is critical for hydrology, agriculture, and climate studies. Infrared brightness temperatures from geostationary satellites offer excellent temporal coverage over continental-scale domains. However, because these measurements primarily characterize cloud-top properties rather than precipitation processes near the surface, their correlation with rainfall intensity remains limited, making quantitative precipitation estimation challenging. In this study, we conduct a systematic inter-comparison of state-of-the-art deep learning models for high-resolution precipitation retrieval from Meteosat Second Generation infrared brightness temperatures over metropolitan France. These models include deterministic U-Nets, transformer-based architectures, conditional GANs, and diffusion models. We construct a curated dataset spanning 2008--2023, combining M{é}t{é}o-France radar mosaics as reference with multi-channel infrared observations, and design preprocessing and sampling strategies to address the heavy-tailed, intermittent nature of rainfall. Our results show that deterministic models provide robust mean estimates and excel in pixel-wise accuracy, but systematically underestimate extreme precipitation. In contrast, generative models better capture the full precipitation distribution, including rare and heavy rainfall events, producing more realistic spatial structures at the cost of reduced pixel-wise fidelity. These results highlight a trade-off between pixel-wise accuracy and precipitation variability, showing that generative approaches are advantageous for extreme-event detection and probabilistic applications. This work establishes a reproducible framework for evaluating infrared- based precipitation retrieval methods and provides guidance for designing models that balance precision, variability, and extreme-event representation.

The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.

Read it on ReadSearch

Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.

Already a reader? Sign in

All new papers in Earth & Environmental Science

Get the few papers worth your time in Earth & Environmental Science every morning.

ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.

Papers belong to their authors and publishers; every page here links to the original. All research topics