arXiv preprint ·
EPISTEME: Trustworthy Coding Agents Through Tool Call Intent
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Coding agents change software through tool calls. Tool calls mutate the local state. For good? For bad? Nobody knows. Agents never say why a tool call is made. We propose the epistemic agent design, in which the harness guarantees that the model declares why a tool call is made. The harness then records what the command actually did and checks the self-reported declaration against these effects. The result is a journal 1) that can guard calls before they run and 2) that supports audits and forensics. For evaluation, we use ImpossibleBench, whose tasks can be passed only by cheating, and demonstrate that forcing the agents to say why results in exposed cheating. Across 49 reward-hacking runs of two open-weight models, the journal exposed 90%.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Software Engineering
DARE: Difficulty Analysis for Repair Enhancement
How Should Agents See Code? Rethinking Code Representations for Agentic Software Engineering
A Hybrid Approach for Automated Security Pattern Recovery
Code, Commits, and Complexity in the GenAI Era: A Longitudinal Study of Team-Based Capstone Projects
Can LLM Agents Learn to Test? Maintaining Scoped Experience as Testing Evidence for Mobile GUI Testing
Get the few papers worth your time in Software Engineering every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.