arXiv preprint ·
Can LLM Agents Learn to Test? Maintaining Scoped Experience as Testing Evidence for Mobile GUI Testing
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Repeated mobile GUI tests can reuse routes, locators, and recovery strategies from earlier executions. However, a route that worked in one workflow or app version may be irrelevant or misleading in another. We study how an LLM-based tester can retain useful experience while withholding entries contradicted by current observations. We present a maintenance contract for AdaptiTest in which reusable experience has an explicit applicability scope, trace provenance, and a lifecycle for confirmation, revalidation, and withdrawal. The contract reserves persistence for a Reflector role and treats recalled experience as advice. The archived implementation does not establish end-to-end enforcement of every specified mechanism. The design changes retrieved context, not model weights. The evaluation uses read-only Android workflows and archived internal comparisons. A six-task, three-repeat ready subset reports 18/18 completed runs with memory versus 3/18 without it, but a grounded single-agent control also solves the earlier hard-task slice. A separate cross-session probe is excluded from efficacy conclusions because of confounded route schedules and unvalidated state labels. We examine 13 selected real-update hazard records across nine subjects, distinguishing stale-locator observations from policy-based withholding and offline retrieval diagnostics. The latter do not measure live-device failures or actions saved. These events are UI changes, not confirmed regression bugs. The evidence supports a bounded design and case study; it does not establish general efficacy, superiority over independent GUI-agent systems, or unrestricted exploration.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Software Engineering
DARE: Difficulty Analysis for Repair Enhancement
How Should Agents See Code? Rethinking Code Representations for Agentic Software Engineering
A Hybrid Approach for Automated Security Pattern Recovery
Code, Commits, and Complexity in the GenAI Era: A Longitudinal Study of Team-Based Capstone Projects
Take It From Here: Evaluating Coding Agents On Project Takeover
Get the few papers worth your time in Software Engineering every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.