arXiv preprint ·

CellPlex: Benchmarking Single-Cell Spatial Proteomics Prediction from H&E

Zijun Gao, Yijiang Chen, Xiangde Luo and Pheng-Ann Heng

Published
Source
arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
Original
Read it at arXiv
Topics
Computer Vision

Abstract

Spatial proteomics measures tens of proteins in every cell of a tissue section, but its cost confines it to small research cohorts, whereas hematoxylin and eosin (H\&E) slides exist for nearly every patient. Inferring single-cell spatial proteomics from H\&E would bring its analyses to routine pathology, and a growing number of virtual staining models pursue this goal. Each is evaluated on its own cohort, panel and pixel-level metric, and released models transfer poorly to new cohorts, leaving open which approach to build on and which proteins H\&E can reveal. We introduce CellPlex, a benchmark that poses the task at the level of the cell: seven cohorts with same-section H\&E and multiplexed immunofluorescence, from colorectal and breast cancer to lymph-node metastases, bone marrow and glioma, with 717 samples, 44.8 million cells and 149 proteins, processed by one pipeline into per-cell targets. Pathology foundation models (PFMs) are adapted with one cell-level protocol, specialist models are fine-tuned under a matched budget, and all are scored on the same cells. Adapted PFMs are the most accurate models on every cohort, ahead of the specialists even after fine-tuning, but keep less than half of their accuracy on cohorts they were not trained on. Which proteins can be predicted depends on the tissue, not on how many cells were measured for them. By fixing the cells, targets and splits on which predictions are judged, CellPlex sets a common standard for inferring costly molecular measurements from routine H\&E and shows how far H\&E can stand in for spatial proteomics. We will release the data, splits, evaluation code and baselines as a testbed for developing and comparing future pathology foundation models and virtual staining methods.

The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.

Read it on ReadSearch

Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.

Already a reader? Sign in

All new papers in Computer Vision

Get the few papers worth your time in Computer Vision every morning.

ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.

Papers belong to their authors and publishers; every page here links to the original. All research topics