arXiv preprint ·

Is This 3D Asset Usable? Beyond the Beauty Render for Asset Curation

Rushikesh Zawar and Vladimir Kim

Published
Source
arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
Original
Read it at arXiv
Topics
Computer Vision

Abstract

Large 3D repositories make it easy to collect assets, but difficult to determine whether they can be reused reliably across scene assembly, editing, rendering, game production, and training-data construction. An asset can look plausible in RGB while hiding disconnected geometry, problematic UV organization, or materials that fail to resolve correctly after import. We introduce Diagnostic Rendered Evidence (DRE): aligned beauty, wireframe, and UV-seam-plus-wireframe views scored by pass-specific frozen ViT classifiers and combined through late fusion. On 1,234 human labeled TexVerse assets, nested grouped evaluation achieves 86.36% balanced accuracy and 88.32% bad-asset recall. On a separate, balanced 764 external reference test, DRE achieved 88.9% balanced reference-label accuracy. Our method requires only an imported asset and renderer-derived evidence, without repository identity, creator, popularity, text, or source metadata at inference. Our results support cross-corpus portability and show that purpose built diagnostic views expose defects that just the beauty views can miss. Webpage: https://rbz-99.github.io/is-this-3d-asset-usable/

The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.

Read it on ReadSearch

Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.

Already a reader? Sign in

All new papers in Computer Vision

Get the few papers worth your time in Computer Vision every morning.

ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.

Papers belong to their authors and publishers; every page here links to the original. All research topics