arXiv preprint ·
The Vibe Paradox: What EEG Reveals About Your Brain When Vibe Coding
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Much of the enthusiasm for vibe coding rests on two intuitive beliefs: (1) that developers stay invested even when they no longer write the code, and (2) that delegating more of the work to AI lowers their cognitive load. Objective: Our goal was to investigate whether developers' neurophysiological states and interactions with AI are consistent with these beliefs when they work with agentic vs. non-agentic AI on their own project vs. a legacy codebase. Method: We conducted an exploratory within-subjects crossover study with 11 participants across 22 sessions. Each participant used GitHub Copilot Chat in one session and Cursor Agents in the other, working on their own project and a legacy codebase, with tool-codebase pairings randomly assigned and session order counterbalanced. We recorded participants' EEG, on-screen activity, and prompts, and analyzed 7,924 EEG data points, 984 activities, and 141 prompts. Results: Our findings contradict both beliefs. With the agent, participants remained indifferent to task outcomes, even on their own projects, and cognitive load was higher than with non-agentic AI. Furthermore, their ways of interacting shifted: with non-agentic AI, participants asked how the code worked and read it to verify changes; with the agent, they described desired app behavior and checked results in the running app. Conclusion: Our study reveals a vibe paradox: delegating to an agent left participants motivationally disinterested, even on their own projects, without relieving cognitive load, while coinciding with increased trust in AI. The community should treat this paradox as a first-class concern if developers and their AI agents are to go far together, and not just fast.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Human-Computer Interaction
Cross-Scale Spatial Reasoning: A Learning-Centered Framework for Designing Immersive Learning Environments
VisCodeBench: a new benchmark dataset for Text-to-Vis reflecting real-world practice
Gamification Box: Automated Personalized Rewards for Improved Task Experience
IMUdrape: Generating Garment-Mounted Virtual IMU Data from Text through Physics-Based Cloth Simulation
Endless VR Walk: Dynamic Mapping of Limited Physical Spaces into Infinite Linear Paths
Get the few papers worth your time in Human-Computer Interaction every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.