arXiv preprint ·
Wrong Together: Shared Bias in User Simulation
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
User simulators generate responses in place of human participants, allowing researchers to estimate the result of a study. To use these estimates before collecting human responses, researchers need a way to assess their reliability. We test whether disagreement among simulators can identify unreliable estimates of a group's response proportions and of differences between groups. We evaluate this signal using 6 language-model simulators and existing GlobalOpinionQA responses for 60 questions in 12 countries. Disagreement predicts invalidity more accurately for differences between two groups than for a single group's response proportions (AUC 0.87 versus 0.71). Errors shared by the simulators remain invisible to this signal. When such an error affects both groups equally, it cancels in the comparison, helping explain the stronger result for group differences. We test this explanation by estimating the shared bias using one set of groups and subtracting it from predictions for a separate set. This correction reduces prediction error without changing disagreement among the simulators. In a retrospective analysis, we simulate referring the 20% of group comparisons with the greatest disagreement for human assessment. Among the remaining comparisons with a conclusive validity judgment, 54.8% are judged invalid, compared with 63.7% before referral.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computation & Language / NLP
WeSearch: A Unified Model-Centric Retrieval Framework for WeChat Search
"PRISM" Is Not All You Need: Cross-Topic Name Collisions and Scientific Paper Retrieval
ElectroChemLLM: A Multimodal LLM Pipeline for High-Fidelity Electrochemical Informatics
CCD: Context-Calibrated Open-Entity Out-of-Distribution Detection in In-Context Tabular Foundation Models
DuSE-Bench: Benchmarking Joint Reasoning over Evolving Dialogue and Documents
Get the few papers worth your time in Computation & Language / NLP every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.