arXiv preprint ·
CCD: Context-Calibrated Open-Entity Out-of-Distribution Detection in In-Context Tabular Foundation Models
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
In-context tabular foundation models (TFMs), such as TabPFN, predict from a labelled context without updating their parameters and are increasingly used for out-of-distribution (OOD) detection in Web applications, whose test rows come from entities absent from that context. Such applications need open-entity OOD detection: a new entity must not be mistaken for an unknown class, and an unknown class must still be caught. Existing detectors fail in this setting, and an entity-split gap hides the failure: random splits also place the test entities in the context. The failure arises because every TFM score reflects how unfamiliar a row is to the context. This produces an entity-over-class bias: known-class rows of new entities look more OOD than familiar ones, sometimes more than unknown classes. Specifically, the two OOD scores most widely used with in-context TFMs face an entity-class trade-off: the TFM's predictive confidence misses unknown classes, whereas the distance of a test row to the context flags new entities. To address this problem, we hold a group of entities out of the context and score them with the remaining context, which turns them into new entities of known classes and tells us how such rows should score. To measure detection on new entities, we build NEO-Tab (New-Entity OOD detection on Tables), 14 grouped and temporal tables on which all test rows come from new entities. We then propose Context-Calibrated Detection (CCD), which uses these group-out swaps on in-distribution data to calibrate three distances and the confidence against new-entity references. CCD weights them by their sensitivity and sharpness, keeps the model frozen and uses no OOD data. On NEO-Tab, CCD outperforms 16 existing detectors on every metric we report, and its lead holds on three TFM backbones.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Information Retrieval
"PRISM" Is Not All You Need: Cross-Topic Name Collisions and Scientific Paper Retrieval
Multi-Teacher Reasoning Distillation for LLM Recommendation with Self-Exploration
RecRSI: Mechanism-Guided Discovery of Recommendation Algorithms
Federated Vector Retrieval across Heterogeneous VectorDBs
SearchInject: Retrieval Exposure Control for Indirect Prompt Injection in Language-Model Search
Get the few papers worth your time in Information Retrieval every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.