arXiv preprint ·
Projecting the Public: Reflections and Recommendations for Empirical Visualization Studies of General Audiences
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Calls for shifting visualization research to general audiences outside of professional contexts have been put forward since the early 2000s, but expanding outwards means contending with a diversity in visualization's communicative purpose beyond transmitting insights from data. After our own experiences studying public-facing visualizations, we sought a set of considerations to help early-career visualization researchers reason through designing empirical visualization studies for the general public that confronts the various ways visualizations are interpreted. We examined literature on guiding paradigms of research, reviewed 73 visualization papers that specify a focus on audiences broader than domain experts, and conducted 15 semi-structured interviews with authors of such papers, to derive the following: (1) a conceptualization of any experiment as 3 elements-casting audience, constructing experimental setting, and projecting audience impressions and interactions into measurable constructs (2) an account of interviewees' aspirations for each element of study design, versus the real challenges that occurred. We detail their approaches to navigate the gaps between aspirations and reality when working with general audiences and summarize them as actionable recommendations. The conceptual framework is intended to help junior researchers scope and outline experimental designs of visualizations "for the masses", while the recommendations provide concrete guidance for putting those designs into practice. The 73 papers are filterable and visualized on our study website, and our code to sample the papers is on GitHub.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Human-Computer Interaction
Do Social Influence Pressures Move LLM Agents? Evidence from Delegated Audit Judgment
Cross-Scale Spatial Reasoning: A Learning-Centered Framework for Designing Immersive Learning Environments
MESSPa: A Multi-modal Embodiment Stimulation Shoulder Pad for Preserving the Sense of Agency in a Detachable Robotic Arm
Gamification Box: Automated Personalized Rewards for Improved Task Experience
Conversational Interaction for LLM-Based Clinical Text-to-SQL: A User Study with Healthcare Professionals
Get the few papers worth your time in Human-Computer Interaction every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.