arXiv preprint ·
Is That Clear? The Impacts of Clarifying Questions on Human-LLM Interaction
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
LLM assistants increasingly ask clarifying questions (CQs) to elicit preferences and tailor recommendations. Although prior work emphasizes improvements in answer quality and user experience, how CQs shape users' subsequent engagement and reliance remains unclear. We conducted a controlled experiment (N=180) across six everyday decision scenarios, comparing human-LLM interaction with and without CQs. We further manipulated whether responses violated explicit constraints and whether violations occurred in the sub-decisions the CQs addressed, while preserving elicited preferences. CQs increased perceived understanding and satisfaction, yet participants spent less time reviewing and evaluating responses and accepted more responses unchanged, including erroneous ones. Within the CQ condition, participants more often accepted responses containing CQ-adjacent violations than nonadjacent violations. These findings demonstrate that LLM's proactive CQs shape subsequent engagement and reliance with preference elicitation. We discuss implications for designing and evaluating proactive assistants that support continued user scrutiny of answers alongside personalization.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Human-Computer Interaction
Do Social Influence Pressures Move LLM Agents? Evidence from Delegated Audit Judgment
Cross-Scale Spatial Reasoning: A Learning-Centered Framework for Designing Immersive Learning Environments
MESSPa: A Multi-modal Embodiment Stimulation Shoulder Pad for Preserving the Sense of Agency in a Detachable Robotic Arm
Gamification Box: Automated Personalized Rewards for Improved Task Experience
Conversational Interaction for LLM-Based Clinical Text-to-SQL: A User Study with Healthcare Professionals
Get the few papers worth your time in Human-Computer Interaction every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.