arXiv preprint ·

Where Beam Search Loses Top-Ranked Items:First-Step Coverage in Generative Recommendation

Heng Yao and Hanwei Zhu

Published
Source
arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
Original
Read it at arXiv
Topics
Information Retrieval

Abstract

Generative recommendation can reproduce a wider beam's ranked output with roughly half the prefix-capacity budget by reallocating retention capacity across semantic-ID positions. We identify a \emph{first-step coverage bottleneck}: across six full-test settings of the TIGER generative recommender spanning three domains and two identifier constructions, every pruned exact top-10 path is first lost at the initial decoding step. An exact-catalog reference isolates search losses and guides a controlled budget intervention. Moving width to the first step raises Search Recall@10 by 0.96--10.90 percentage points at Beam-50's unchanged budget. Across all 77,373 test users with residual-quantized variational autoencoder (RQ-VAE) tokenization, the reallocated schedule reproduces Beam-100's ordered top-10 at nominal budgets of 151 rather than 301, without retraining or changing identifiers or scores. Matched-output timing saves 6.35--6.39\% of decoder latency; profiling identifies the execution costs that limit the translation from reduced search work to runtime savings. Larger-candidate experiments reveal how output size changes retention requirements. These findings make budget placement an actionable serving decision: locate ranking loss, redirect search capacity, and preserve downstream inputs before increasing uniform beam width.

The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.

Read it on ReadSearch

Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.

Already a reader? Sign in

All new papers in Information Retrieval

Get the few papers worth your time in Information Retrieval every morning.

ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.

Papers belong to their authors and publishers; every page here links to the original. All research topics