arXiv preprint ·
Answer Correction with Verifiable Rewards: A Gemma-Family Study of Multi-View Driving QA
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Multi-camera driving question answering provides a discrete test of vision-language models, but post-training gains can reflect changed selected answers or improved answer extraction. We investigate this distinction within the Gemma model family using archived, task-linked WaymoQA evaluations. A zero-shot diagnostic on 5,519 test questions spans effective-small, mixture-of-experts, unified, and dense checkpoints, with serving differences disclosed rather than interpreted as architecture effects. The strongest controlled evidence is a matched-harness Gemma-4-12B base/GRPO pair: accuracy rises from 73.78% to 75.43%, a gain of 1.65 percentage points with a scene-cluster bootstrap interval of [+0.84, +2.41]. There are 215 improvements and 124 regressions; 213 improvements start from an extractable but incorrect base answer, and only two recover previously unextractable responses. Crossing correctness with extraction state shows why correct noncompliant outputs cannot be counted as prediction errors. Category counts reveal a critical safety asymmetry: routine perception gains (+5.93 pp) mask a regression in safety-critical hazard prediction (-1.82 pp), demonstrating that unweighted outcome rewards can trade off rare edge cases for aggregate accuracy. Reward saturation describes sampled training dynamics rather than an architectural ceiling. A separate archived Gemma-31B thinking comparison yields no detected average improvement, with uncertainty that does not establish equivalence. These results support a modest answer-selection gain for the recorded tuning configuration and a reproducible diagnostic accounting, without attributing corrected labels to specific grounding mechanisms or claiming superiority over matched supervised tuning.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computer Vision
Spatial Uncertainty Analytics for Budget-Limited Inspection of Hyperspectral Scenes
IMPACT: Image-Conditioned Motion with Physics-Aware Collision and Trajectory Guidance for Video Generation
A Straight Line Is Not a Camera Pose: Auditing Short-Clip Pose Benchmarks
Vocabulary Aligned Explanations for Computer Vision Models
Selecting or Solving? What Best-of-N Verification Delivers in Video Reasoning
Get the few papers worth your time in Computer Vision every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.