arXiv preprint ·
Spatial Uncertainty Analytics for Budget-Limited Inspection of Hyperspectral Scenes
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Land-cover maps classified from wide-area hyperspectral surveys are least reliable along class boundaries and in ambiguous regions, so their errors are spatially structured. We study how this structure can direct a limited verification budget: when a low-altitude UAV or a ground crew can visit only a handful of sites, where it should go depends on how classifier uncertainty is arranged across the scene and how a fixed sensor footprint tiles that arrangement. We estimate a per-pixel uncertainty surface from the disagreement of an ensemble of spectral classifiers and select sites by greedy, field-of-view-aware coverage of the uncertainty mass. On seven benchmark scenes, the highest-uncertainty decile of pixels is 2.6 to 7.9 times richer in errors than the scene as a whole, and the coverage greedy covers up to 57% of the classifier's errors with 15 sites, 1.7 to 18 times as many as uncertainty-agnostic sampling of the same labelled region. A non-overlapping selection of the footprints richest in uncertainty does equally well, so the gain comes from scoring whole footprints by uncertainty mass. The advantage persists under spatially blocked evaluation and with a spectral-spatial classifier, although disagreement then ranks errors less well. It requires restricting the surface to labelled land cover: over the whole scene, disagreement peaks on unlabelled ground, where inspections cannot be scored. The best policy for covering connected high-uncertainty regions depends on the scene and on the threshold that defines them, and Gaussian-process selection covers less uncertainty than the coverage greedy on every scene. The pipeline runs on commodity CPUs.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computer Vision
IMPACT: Image-Conditioned Motion with Physics-Aware Collision and Trajectory Guidance for Video Generation
A Straight Line Is Not a Camera Pose: Auditing Short-Clip Pose Benchmarks
Vocabulary Aligned Explanations for Computer Vision Models
Selecting or Solving? What Best-of-N Verification Delivers in Video Reasoning
SpecUltra: A Unified Foundation Model for Heterogeneous Spectral Images
Get the few papers worth your time in Computer Vision every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.