arXiv preprint ·

EduExplain: A Benchmark for Explanation-Set Retrieval and Storyboard Construction in Educational Explanation

Aryan Ahmed, Riti Verma, Sanskar Singh and Maya Ramanath

Published
Source
arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
Original
Read it at arXiv
Topics
Information Retrieval

Abstract

Generating an educational explanation for a learner's query is not a single retrieval step but a pipeline: a system must first retrieve a compact set of complementary resources--passages, figures, examples, activities--that jointly support an explanation, then structure that set into an ordered, timed, role-assigned plan before rendering it as a lesson or video. Existing retrieval benchmarks evaluate neither stage at the level these applications require: they score individual documents rather than explanation sets, and provide no ground truth for how a set should be organised into an explanation. We present EduExplain, a benchmark providing human-validated ground truth for both stages. Built from secondary-level science textbooks, it comprises 6,921 typed, multimodal resources and 2,123 concepts, and pairs each of 321 learner-oriented queries with one or more human-validated explanation sets (retrieval ground truth) and 741 reference storyboards (structuring ground truth). The benchmark exposes characteristics absent from prior datasets: heterogeneous multimodal retrieval units, multiple valid explanation sets per query, and plans whose quality depends on pedagogical role composition, grounding, and timing rather than relevance alone. We describe an LLM-assisted, human-validated construction pipeline, report inter-annotator agreement for both layers, and establish baselines for each stage--lexical, dense, multimodal, and cross-encoder retrieval paired with four selection strategies, and free-form and fixed-template storyboard construction. Our results show that first-stage retrieval quality dominates retrieval-stage performance, that off-the-shelf diversity-based selection underperforms simple top-ranked selection, and that unconstrained and rigidly templated structuring both fall short of the reference plans. The benchmark is available at https://github.com/data-iitd/eduexplain.

The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.

Read it on ReadSearch

Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.

Already a reader? Sign in

All new papers in Information Retrieval

Get the few papers worth your time in Information Retrieval every morning.

ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.

Papers belong to their authors and publishers; every page here links to the original. All research topics