arXiv preprint ·
From White Canes to Edge AI: A Survey of Assistive Navigation Technologies for Blind and Low-Vision Individuals
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Independent mobility is a foundational requirement for the autonomy of blind and low-vision (BLV) individuals, yet the assistive technologies that support it have historically evolved slowly. This survey systematically reviews 108 peer-reviewed studies published between 2008 and 2026, organizing the field into four technological eras: (i) a foundational era of passive mechanical aids, namely the white cane and the guide dog; (ii) a hardware era of electronic travel aids built on ultrasonic, infrared, and satellite positioning sensors that alert users to proximity but lack semantic understanding; (iii) a deep learning era in which convolutional and transformer-based detectors introduced context-aware scene understanding, initially tethered to cloud infrastructure; and (iv) a contemporary edge-native era defined by model compression, quantization, hardware acceleration, and multi-sensor fusion that relocate intelligence onto resource-constrained wearable and mobile devices. For each era we analyze representative systems, sensing modalities, computational architectures, and reported performance, and we consolidate the field's model-optimization techniques into a single technical reference spanning four detector families and twelve compression strategies. Across the corpus, we find a persistent mismatch between rapid algorithmic progress and slow real-world adoption, driven by cognitive overload in user interfaces, fragmented evaluation protocols, and the scarcity of studies involving BLV participants. We conclude with open challenges, including seamless indoor-outdoor transition, standardized benchmarks, privacy-preserving perception, and the emerging role of multimodal foundation models, and outline a roadmap for socially acceptable, user-centered assistive navigation.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Human-Computer Interaction
Do Social Influence Pressures Move LLM Agents? Evidence from Delegated Audit Judgment
Cross-Scale Spatial Reasoning: A Learning-Centered Framework for Designing Immersive Learning Environments
MESSPa: A Multi-modal Embodiment Stimulation Shoulder Pad for Preserving the Sense of Agency in a Detachable Robotic Arm
Gamification Box: Automated Personalized Rewards for Improved Task Experience
Conversational Interaction for LLM-Based Clinical Text-to-SQL: A User Study with Healthcare Professionals
Get the few papers worth your time in Human-Computer Interaction every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.