arXiv preprint ·

Compression Technique Interactions in Small Language Models: A Factorial Ablation Study

Bhushit Nema, Siddharth Krishnamurthy and Anjali Kadiyala

Published
Source
arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
Original
Read it at arXiv
Topics
Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

Deploying small language models on resource-constrained hardware requires compression, yet practitioners lack systematic guidance on how quantization, pruning, and post-compression recovery interact when combined. We present a factorial ablation study evaluating 72 compression configurations across four SLM architectures (2.7B-7B parameters), extended with a 48-configuration ordering analysis, benchmark accuracy validation on 30 compressed models, and robustness checks including multi-seed validation and full-corpus perplexity evaluation. INT8 quantization is effectively lossless (<0.5% accuracy degradation), while NF4 quantization combined with L1 magnitude pruning causes model collapse in all 16 tested combinations. LoRA-based fine-tuning reduces degraded perplexity by up to 97% after aggressive pruning; an ablation against standard fine-tuning without a teacher model shows the recovery is driven by LoRA adaptation itself rather than the distillation signal. Compression ordering shows no significant effect among viable configurations (ANOVA p = 0.96) but determines viability for NF4+pruning combinations. INT8 quantization alone provides 40-45% memory reduction with no quality loss. On-device CPU deployment via llama.cpp confirms these findings transfer off the GPU: 4-bit quantization runs 46-54% faster than 8-bit for a perplexity difference under 0.5 points, while un-structured pruning yields no CPU latency or memory benefit, consistent with its dense storage format.

The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.

Read it on ReadSearch

Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.

Already a reader? Sign in

All new papers in Artificial Intelligence

Get the few papers worth your time in Artificial Intelligence every morning.

ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.

Papers belong to their authors and publishers; every page here links to the original. All research topics