arXiv preprint ·

Few Trials, Many Metrics: Beta Mixtures for Low-Budget AI Evaluation

Gustavo Tironi, Felipe Maia Polo and Diego Mesquita

Published
Source
arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
Original
Read it at arXiv
Topics
Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

Evaluating a stochastic AI system often requires many repeated samples per instance, especially for metrics defined over long horizons. Recent work has shown that modeling instance-level success probabilities with a Beta distribution recovers Pass@$k$ from far fewer samples than direct estimation. We show that this framework supports a broader range of evaluation targets. We fit a mixture of Beta distributions by marginal maximum likelihood, with the number of components chosen by BIC. From that one fit, we compute Pass$^k$ and AUC@$k$ at any horizon in closed form. We also derive delta-method confidence intervals for these metrics and for Pass@$k$, which require no additional model calls. Treating configurations rather than tasks as instances extends the same model to sensitivity analysis. For repeated success metrics, we find that mixture priors yield more accurate estimators than naive estimation across competition mathematics and graduate-level science benchmarks when extrapolating beyond the observed number of trials, and the resulting intervals cover the full-data reference. When prompts are treated as instances, it estimates the distribution of prompt sensitivity more accurately than a comparable item-response baseline without external covariates. Direct estimators remain preferable once trials reach the target horizon.

The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.

Read it on ReadSearch

Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.

Already a reader? Sign in

All new papers in Artificial Intelligence

Get the few papers worth your time in Artificial Intelligence every morning.

ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.

Papers belong to their authors and publishers; every page here links to the original. All research topics