arXiv preprint ·
On the Limits of Test-Time Compute for Self-Evaluation
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Self-verification and aggregation have emerged as popular approaches for bridging the gap between pass@1 and pass@N. However, increasing the number of candidates does not consistently narrow the gap between final-answer accuracy and pass@N. To understand this limitation, we use ranking error to measure how reliably models distinguish their correct generations from incorrect ones. We show that ranking error admits a bias-variance decomposition, with both components shaped by algorithmic design choices and inference compute. Across our experiments, additional compute reduces variance, while bias initially decreases before approaching a plateau. Guided by this analysis, we introduce Scorpio, a simple and general method that jointly scores randomly grouped candidates. Across math, code, and puzzle benchmarks, Scorpio improves verification, tree search, and aggregation. For verification, Scorpio improves accuracy over the strongest baseline by up to 7 percentage points while matching or exceeding that baseline's peak accuracy with 17-42% lower inference cost. For tree search, using Scorpio to score partial solutions and select the final answer improves accuracy by up to 10 percentage points over prior methods. Finally, Scorpio improves the scaling of aggregation-based methods by 11 percentage points on coding tasks.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning
CIRCE Divines LLM Task Complexity from Constraint Structure
Few Trials, Many Metrics: Beta Mixtures for Low-Budget AI Evaluation
Verifying Text-to-SQL Queries under Changing Business Semantics
Threat Modeling Intimate Partner Abuse in Agentic Systems
QUAL: Quantile Alignment Improves Zero-Shot Time-Series Foundation Models
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.