arXiv preprint ·
CompoSET: A Controlled Single-Edit Benchmark for Vision-Language Compositionality
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Vision-language compositionality is the ability to identify which properties, relations, quantities, and states bind to which entities in both an image and a caption, and to match those bindings across modalities. Existing benchmarks evaluate this ability through image-text matching: a model ranks candidate image-caption match similarities and succeeds when the correct match comes on top. In such datasets, paired images differ by more than a single binding: scene, layout, and content all differ, with 97% of pixels changing on average. Such pairs do not isolate compositionality: results are confounded by global image differences. We introduce Compositional Single-EdiT (CompoSET), a benchmark dataset in which each base image-caption pair has an edited counterpart, or foil, that preserves the scene but differs by a single controlled edit, such as color, count, spatial relation, or object state. Base and foil images preserve naturalistic scene complexity yet are visually near-identical: only 8% of pixels change on average. Our dataset has many foils per base scene (~22) in order to separate scene difficulty from edit difficulty, a distinction one-foil-per-base benchmarks cannot make. CompoSET contains 1,776 instances across 80 naturalistic scenes, spanning 16 edit types in 4 semantic categories, with captions at 3 verbosity levels. We test 22 dual-encoder VLMs and find that all models perform at or below chance level on CompoSET, despite scoring well on prior benchmarks. This suggests that apparent progress under prior image-text matching protocols may be an artifact arising from confounds in benchmark design, and that compositional understanding in dual-encoder VLMs is far from solved. CompoSET addresses the confounds and offers a better controlled benchmark to measure future progress.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computer Vision
An Empirical Study on Learning Rooftop Solar Potential from Satellite Imagery Directly Without Explicit Geometry
Spatial Uncertainty Analytics for Budget-Limited Inspection of Hyperspectral Scenes
A Straight Line Is Not a Camera Pose: Auditing Short-Clip Pose Benchmarks
MotorSense: A Video-EMG Dataset of Motoric Representations for Action Understanding
Selecting or Solving? What Best-of-N Verification Delivers in Video Reasoning
Get the few papers worth your time in Computer Vision every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.