arXiv preprint ·
Measuring Personal Information Exposure in Mental Health-Related Conversations with LLMs
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used for informal mental health support, yet the privacy implications of conversational interaction remain poorly understood. Prior LLM privacy research has focused largely on model-side risks such as memorization and adversarial extraction, leaving personal information inferred from ordinary conversation understudied. We introduce a profile-recovery framework that measures personal information exposure by comparing user profiles with attributes inferred from conversation alone. We generate 240 synthetic multi-turn mental health conversations from profiles sampled from a nationally representative health survey and validate them against real counseling transcripts, finding comparable overall disclosure volume. Across 21 attributes, 33-41% of each profile is recoverable, with 76.5% first-inference and 94.3% any-of-3 accuracy. 239 of 240 conversations expose at least one sensitive mental health attribute, and 45.0\% expose all six. Our findings reveal a gap between disclosure and inferability, motivating HCI approaches to make inference risks legible and support privacy-aware interaction design.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Human-Computer Interaction
Usable String Matching by Humans through Overlaid Presentation
Flash Word : ESL Listening Support with Subtitle Skimming
Unlocking with the Heart: Investigating User Perceptions of ECG-Based Biometric Authentication
When Should AI Agents Ask? Clarification Requests Under Limited Human Attention
Wearable Biosensors for Early Detection and Continuous Monitoring of Postpartum Depression: A Human-Centered Approach
Get the few papers worth your time in Human-Computer Interaction every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.