arXiv preprint ·
Confidence-Modulated Safety Filtering for End-to-End Policies
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
End-to-end policies, from task-specific controllers to robot foundation models, learn complex behavior from raw observations but are not guaranteed to remain safe, so they are often wrapped in a safety filter. The resulting system operates under two domains: the filter's operational design domain (ODD), where its assumptions hold and safety is certified, and the policy's competence domain, where it is reliable. Filters typically fix their conservativeness regardless of the policy's competence, trading performance inside the ODD against margin beyond it. We ask whether the policy's confidence should set that level, and propose a filter-agnostic pipeline that modulates it at runtime: inside the ODD, where every setting is safe, confidence buys performance; beyond it, low confidence adds margin, which helps when it flags where the filter's model fails. Preliminary F1TENTH simulations, where this holds, show the modulated filter combining the strengths of permissive and conservative filters.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Robotics
Unlocking with the Heart: Investigating User Perceptions of ECG-Based Biometric Authentication
HIPC: Humanoid Iterative Planning and Control via Goal-Conditioned Motion Closure
REALM: Identifying Minimal Task Assets for LLM Agents
Quantile Propagation Planning for Budgeted Tail-Risk Evaluation
BEVLight: Generalizable Traffic Signal Control from UAV Bird's-Eye Views
Get the few papers worth your time in Robotics every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.