arXiv preprint ·

Spatial Atlas-Informed Loss Ensembles for Whole-Body PSMA PET/CT Metastasis Segmentation

Grant N. Chau, Bashirul A. Biswas, Biratal Wagle, Matthew E. Maeder, Michael S. Leapman, James B. Yu and Indrani Bhattacharya

Published
Source
arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
Original
Read it at arXiv
Topics
Computer Vision

Abstract

Existing whole-body PSMA PET/CT prostate metastasis segmentation methods generally rely on images alone, without explicitly incorporating where metastases tend to occur. We investigate whether a population metastasis atlas can improve lesion detection when integrated into model training. We constructed voxel-wise mean and standard deviation maps from 375 expert-annotated training scans and used them to weight the cross-entropy loss of an nnU-Net. The additional penalties for missed lesions and false positives depend on spatial atlas statistics and diminish as predictions become confidently correct. Seven configurations were compared on validation data; three were combined by majority voting into SAILS (Spatial Atlas-Informed Loss enSemble). We compared SAILS with a baseline nnU-Net and inference-time atlas fusion on AutoPET~III (110 disease-positive cases) and Deep-PSMA (100 external cases). No atlas or registration is needed at inference. Results: On AutoPET~III, SAILS improved whole-body Dice (0.531 vs. 0.520; p=0.006), reduced missed-lesion volume (9.5 vs. 12.1 cc/case; p<0.01), and increased pooled lesion sensitivity (0.857 vs. 0.843; p=0.004). On Deep-PSMA, SAILS detected 126 additional reference lesions (sensitivity 0.769 vs. 0.751; p<0.001), without a significant whole-body Dice change (-0.009; p=0.36). High-risk bone Dice improved in both cohorts (0.576 vs. 0.552 and 0.667 vs. 0.653; both p<0.01). False-positive volume increased by 2.3 and 18.2 cc/case, respectively (p<0.001). Atlas-weighted training improves lesion detection, especially in high-risk bone, without test-time atlas registration, but increases false positives.

The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.

Read it on ReadSearch

Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.

Already a reader? Sign in

All new papers in Computer Vision

Get the few papers worth your time in Computer Vision every morning.

ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.

Papers belong to their authors and publishers; every page here links to the original. All research topics