arXiv preprint ·
Improving Group Deliberation through AI-Guided Self-Reflection
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
As AI systems increasingly mediate human communication, identifying conditions under which they augment collective sense-making is a critical challenge. Through a randomized experiment (N=1,173 U.S. participants across 391 small-group deliberations), we investigate whether AI-guided self-reflection improves subsequent deliberative discourse. We show that engaging with a non-directive AI chatbot instructed to structure self-reflection prior to group deliberation yields significantly higher deliberation quality (measured by the Discourse Quality Index, DQI) compared to a baseline of no self-reflection (Cohen's d=0.31) and a condition of unassisted self-reflection (d=0.27), and the positive impact is most pronounced in groups with disagreement. This improvement may be driven by more sophisticated argument justifications, greater consensus-building effort, and increased respect for counterarguments. Furthermore, after self-reflection, participants in the AI condition reported higher empathy toward dissenting peers and a deeper understanding of opposing reasoning. Beyond observed behavior, our findings are empirically relevant to open debates between political philosophy and psychology surrounding self-reflection, demonstrating that interactive AI could transform solitary thinking into productive internal reflection. Together, these results demonstrate that even simple AI-based reflective scaffolds can foster more productive group dynamics, opening new avenues for leveraging AI to augment collective intelligence.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Human-Computer Interaction
No Tokenizer, Still a Gap: Cross-Lingual Fairness of Homoglyph and Invisible-Character Watermarking
From the Gettier Machine to Justified True Output: A Three-Step Account of Rational Trust in Generative AI
Multi-Scale Spatio-Temporal Exploratory Analysis of Urban Vehicle Theft
Beauty Is Human: When People Love AI-Generated Art, They Think a Human Made It
CogArena: Benchmarking Multimodal Agents on Interactive Behavioral Experiments
Get the few papers worth your time in Human-Computer Interaction every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.