arXiv preprint ·
Understanding Human-Robot Collaboration through Joint Action
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Human-robot collaboration requires partners to coordinate interdependent contributions toward a shared goal. Joint Action theory provides concepts for understanding this coordination, but how these concepts are instantiated and combined across empirical research remains fragmented. We conducted a systematic review following PRISMA 2020, identifying 83 empirical papers published between 2021 and 2026. Through theory-driven framework analysis, we organized the literature into nine constructs across three capacities: Representation, Prediction, and Integration. We analyze how these constructs are distributed and co-occur across studies, revealing where empirical evidence concentrates and where it is absent. By mapping empirical HRC research onto a unified Joint Action framework, this review offers a coherent overview of HRC studies, identifies gaps in current evidence, and provides guidelines for future research.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Human-Computer Interaction
What Victims Take Away: Attack Reuse and Defense Revision after Prompt-Injection Attacks
Beauty Is Human: When People Love AI-Generated Art, They Think a Human Made It
CogArena: Benchmarking Multimodal Agents on Interactive Behavioral Experiments
LogicTree: Object-Oriented Writing for Structured Human-AI Academic Authoring
Measuring Users' Security and Privacy Concerns About Third-Party Community Bots on Discord
Get the few papers worth your time in Human-Computer Interaction every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.